Don't Say "I Could Do That!"

I feel like venting for a second. 

..Or for a few paragraphs.

I have an artistic pet-peeve. 

People think 'simple' art is "easy" or "bad." For example, if I had a dollar for every time I heard "I could do that" or worse, "I could do better than that," in reference to a children's book illustration, a fine art piece, or really any kind of art, I would be a rich woman.
Now, I am going to make it clear right here that there are a lot of artists that get published that do not design well. But, for the most part, I think most are misunderstanding the beauty of simplicity, expression, and composition. Most artists compose everything. They design the character, the environment, the negative (or empty) space, the text...everything. If it looks simplified, it is because they meant to draw it in that style, not because that is the only way they know how to draw.

 I read in a book once that children typically draw really expressive and creative until they hit about 10-12. Then, they develop this fascination with realism. They want everything they draw to look like it does in their mind, or in real life. They get frustrated when doesn't, and they loose their passion for creating for the sake of creating. Who cares if a 4-year-old draws her mom with 10 fingers? I bet she had a blast making all those lines! (AND, sadly, many parents, siblings, and teachers also stifle children's creativity at this age by pushing realism. For example "the grass isn't purple," or "That doesn't look like Bobby!" But that is a vent for another day.) (AAAAAND, let me add that I loooove realism, and this is in no way a kabosh against representational art.)
So, according to the book I read, that is why most adults draw like a 10-12 year old. Because that is when they basically gave up. Tragic day.


Wow, that was a side track. I am talking about misunderstand art here.

Here are some examples:

                  A) One of my all-time favorite illustrators is Quentin Blake. He illustrated many of the Roald Dahl books. I am ashamed to admit it, but as a child I really disliked his artwork. I thought it was sloppy. But now, I love the way his marks are so expressive and loose, and they are all beautifully, and simply composed. You can tell he has fun with each illustration. I would really love to hang a print in my home.

                B) Picasso. I think he was artistic genius, but his work--especially his cubist pieces, are definitely over critiqued by the ignorant. 

Pablo Picasso was actually an incredibly skilled realist painter. You can see his progression in early paintings:

But he was passionate about discovering and pushing the envelope. Cubism was the result of finding geometric shapes in the human form, and depicting multiple planes at the same time. 

I love what Lori McNee says, "He learned the illusion of volume then he deliberately learned how to flatten it. It didn’t happen overnight. In fact, he spent his whole life trying to remember how to paint like a child! Despite his childlike painting, there was never a man who explored art more seriously."

Read more: http://www.finearttips.com/2009/03/breaking-the-rules-2/#ixzz2vcqyyBF5

I am a fan of Picasso. I love how he wasn't afraid to change his style as he learned and discovered. 

          C) The KING of the 'bad-art rap' is non-objective or abstract art. This is something I am really passionate about defending, because non-objective art is all about the design and composition, or it is about a specific statement. Of course I don't find all abstract art beautiful. But I'll defend them never the less....
I love making my own non-objective art. It is a stress-relief, especially when I am working on a big project with a lot of people that look like people and so forth. Sometimes it just feels so good to pull a "Jackson Polluck" and get crazy with the paint (or pixels in my case)...

(A painting by Jackson Polluck. He was known for putting a canvas on the floor and throwing paint at it. I don't know about you, but it sounds like a blast. I would love to get paid millions of dollars to do that.)

Here are some other examples of famous shape-oriented pieces that I find beautiful. 

This piece by Josef Albers called Homage to the Square: Confidant is a great example of the beauty of simple shape and careful composition. He demonstrates that colors have value (or a lightness and darkness), and that ordering the values helps emphasize a focal point. I love tidy, neat lines...probably because that isn't usually how I paint. But there is something profoundly beautiful to me about order, and clean, crisp lines. 

This piece by Mark Rothko, No. 13, I would love to hang in my home. I love anytime I see the artist's brushstrokes on their work, because it is like seeing their thought process. I guess it is a little like having a mathematician 'show their work' on paper. I also love the 'torn' paper look with the uneven edges. And, while they are rough and uneven, they still easily communicate 'rectangle.' I also easily find a symbolic meaning with this...the white rectangle seems to be transcending the others...like a spiritual or uplifting experience. 

Composition with Red, Blue and Yellow, Piet Mondrian. I guess I really do have a thing for squares and rectangles, because I just realized all the examples I chose are really geometric. I love the power of contrasts in this piece..the values are controlled well to bring your eye to the red square, then down to the yellow, then to the blue. I also love the variety of the lines..some are thicker and some are shorter. Definitely not a boring painting!

And just to mix it up, here is a more organic one:

This is by Theresa Paden. Check out more of her art at http://www.abstractartistgallery.org/theresa-paden/

The colors and values frame the composition well, and I really enjoy the juicy brushstrokes. Truly a beautiful painting. 

I'm not saying you have to find all art beautiful, just try to understand it. Beautiful compositions take a lot of trial, error, practice and patience to perfect.

And just for fun, here are a few that I did!

Country or City?

Hey Everyone! Hope you are having a wonderful sunday! I hope you get to spend time with loved ones today.
Here is a post from long ago that I never published. Now seems like a great time to post it, because it means I don't have to write anything :)
------

Where would your ideal home be? In a bustling, crowded, exciting city--or in a quite, quaint country side?

Do you find energy in crowds and love to be where the action is, or do you find large groups of people unsettling and prefer the quiet of nature with a few close friends?

When you think of a perfect view, do you think city scape or mountain vista?

Public life or private life?

I have been thinking a lot about what it means to be a "City Girl" or a "Country Girl" (or boy, respectively). Can preferring one over another really be a refection on your personality? Do extroverts prefer the city, and introverts the country? Is it strictly a matter of where you were raised, or can you secretly be a City Girl if you spend your life in the country?

I have always lived in small towns. The first town I remember living in had a population of a little less than 6,000. My parents lived out of town on several acres, and I feel like my childhood was absolutely idyllic. I would spend hours playing outside and exploring the world around me. We had great homemade fun---such as a cable zip line that propelled your body down a very steep hill at incredible speeds (I was always too chicken to ride...especially since I watched my brothers smack into the tree at the other end!). We would hike around our property, or play in an old wooden fort. We also raised livestock (sheep, a few cows, horses, pigs, chickens), and I could write a novel about those crazy and entertaining moments---really an unorganized rodeo.

As a teenager, my parents moved to another town, population about 12,000. We again moved to a home on acreage, several miles outside of town. Most of the land is a large hill behind our home ( about 30 acres), and I loved running up that hill. It is something I still do when I visit my family. I can't believe the beauty and solitude in my backyard.

Now, my husband and I live in a city.

 At first it was a real challenge. I hated that the "fresh air" smelt (and smells) like cigarettes and animal feces. And just feeling trapped, buildings, streets, people everywhere...

But now, I don't know. I getting more used to it...or maybe I just forgot what the country is like.

What do you think?
Are you a Country Bumpkin or a City Slicker?
How does your population preference effect your personality and lifestyle?

(http://misguidedchildren.com/politics/2013/11/a-sick-sad-country/7699)

(http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-new-york-city-the-next-detroit/)

Scripture of the day:

John 14:15 "If ye love me, keep my commandments" (KJV)

Such a short scripture, but such a profound message. We obey laws or rules for many different reasons. We may follow order because of tradition or habit. We may follow out of fear---fear for the chaos that would occur, for example, if no one heeded traffic signals. Or, the personal fear of being 'caught'. We may obey because of a sense of duty. Feeling like it is the "right" thing to do. Many of these motives may also apply to moral laws and standards as well.
Christ teaches a deep lesson here. It is good to keep the commandments, but it is best to keep the commandments because we are motivated by the love we feel for our Savior. But if you don't feel that love it certainly isn't bad to just do what you should anyway. Conversion will come.

On the flip side, I believe if we make loving Jesus Christ, and loving others as He loved us, our highest priority, then we will naturally want to be obedient.

True love inspires and motivates great action. This is true for parenting as well.
It is all about the love.